tny
Sep 13, 11:06 AM
It is not Apple's decison. Do you think the content owner would allow this? I doubt it - they would want to charge again.
Anyway, think yourself lucky - the majority of the planet cannot get movies or series content from iTunes.
I'm not so sure about that . . . after all, Apple has replaced all the old 320x240 content with 640x480 content, right? And there's nothing stopping you from having two copies of any given video file, only a mechanism to prevent you from using those files on more than a limited number of devices. There would have to be explicit language saying that Apple couldn't sell an upgrade to a higher resolution, or at least language saying Apple couldn't allow free/discounted downloads of a work that the downloader had previously purchased.
Anyway, think yourself lucky - the majority of the planet cannot get movies or series content from iTunes.
I'm not so sure about that . . . after all, Apple has replaced all the old 320x240 content with 640x480 content, right? And there's nothing stopping you from having two copies of any given video file, only a mechanism to prevent you from using those files on more than a limited number of devices. There would have to be explicit language saying that Apple couldn't sell an upgrade to a higher resolution, or at least language saying Apple couldn't allow free/discounted downloads of a work that the downloader had previously purchased.
kntgsp
Apr 4, 04:38 PM
The MacBook Air and the iPad are the future of portable computing. Thin, light, fast (SSD). Enough power to get the job done, not so much power you need 3 cooling fans and 3 lbs. of battery to do it.
It's not that the MacBook Air is evolving into a mainstream product. It's the mainstream that's evolving into MacBook Air-like products.
Definitely have to agree with you there. We haven't seen rampant advances in software that have outpaced hardware improvements.
The MBA does music, video, internet, email, photos, etc. very well while still remaining small and light.
It's not that the MacBook Air is evolving into a mainstream product. It's the mainstream that's evolving into MacBook Air-like products.
Definitely have to agree with you there. We haven't seen rampant advances in software that have outpaced hardware improvements.
The MBA does music, video, internet, email, photos, etc. very well while still remaining small and light.
waloshin
Apr 28, 11:32 AM
You're going to buy an AM2+ motherboard NOW?
I only have ddr2 and a I dont want to buy a new motherboard and ddr3 , but I might.
I only have ddr2 and a I dont want to buy a new motherboard and ddr3 , but I might.
arn
Dec 31, 03:03 AM
Originally posted by Flowbee
Looks great, but I've just started getting this freaky green box under the top of the left column. (??) Latest Panther, Safari.
should be fixed now
arn
Looks great, but I've just started getting this freaky green box under the top of the left column. (??) Latest Panther, Safari.
should be fixed now
arn
100Teraflops
Mar 6, 10:48 PM
I store an archive of my RAW files as DMG images of my memory cards on a large 1TB drive.
I keep a subset of those (keepers) as my working images in my Aperture Library on my system drive.
For 2010...
My RAW file archives consumed about 300GB, which is shooting an average of 1000 pictures per month or so (25MB per RAW image).
My Aperture Library consumed 138GB, which as you can see, is a little less than half of the pictures I took.
If I was you, I would plan on using an External drive to archive your RAW images to, and selectively importing only the ones you feel are "keepers" into your desired photo management application on your system drive. Even if you import all the photos from a shoot to your management app on the system drive, you can later prune it down to keep the size of your working library reasonable.
Periodically, you can also archive your photo management library to an external drive and start a new one on your system drive when it starts to get full.
The bottom line is that with some proper image management, and a large external drive, you can essentially get by with nearly any size of drive on your laptop... it's size will merely dictate how often you need to archive things to your external, which of course, also depends on how much you shoot.
Thanks VirtualRain! That makes a lot of sense using an external drive. As of now, my photos are the same size, but I do not know the size, but I have to enlarge them in order to see detail etc... I will have to think about 'segregating' my photos, as I do not do that currently. However, there is nothing wrong with it, as you point out it is "photo management." :cool:
Also, I was wondering whether the size of the pix utilized more GB, thanks for clarifying this!
I keep a subset of those (keepers) as my working images in my Aperture Library on my system drive.
For 2010...
My RAW file archives consumed about 300GB, which is shooting an average of 1000 pictures per month or so (25MB per RAW image).
My Aperture Library consumed 138GB, which as you can see, is a little less than half of the pictures I took.
If I was you, I would plan on using an External drive to archive your RAW images to, and selectively importing only the ones you feel are "keepers" into your desired photo management application on your system drive. Even if you import all the photos from a shoot to your management app on the system drive, you can later prune it down to keep the size of your working library reasonable.
Periodically, you can also archive your photo management library to an external drive and start a new one on your system drive when it starts to get full.
The bottom line is that with some proper image management, and a large external drive, you can essentially get by with nearly any size of drive on your laptop... it's size will merely dictate how often you need to archive things to your external, which of course, also depends on how much you shoot.
Thanks VirtualRain! That makes a lot of sense using an external drive. As of now, my photos are the same size, but I do not know the size, but I have to enlarge them in order to see detail etc... I will have to think about 'segregating' my photos, as I do not do that currently. However, there is nothing wrong with it, as you point out it is "photo management." :cool:
Also, I was wondering whether the size of the pix utilized more GB, thanks for clarifying this!
jvoto
Apr 28, 08:33 AM
Sorry for the delay. I did hook up the airport express and still it says that the ethernet is not plugged into the WAN port. I don't understand. I have had the cable company come out and they say the internet and modem are working fine. Am I to believe that the WAN port is not working on both my TC and AE, both going out at the same time? Any help is appreciated.
mattg3
Apr 20, 05:11 AM
Thanks,yes I was confused.I was trying to figure out what size ipad to buy and needed one large enough for my itunes library.homesharing is the option I was looking for.So if I have wifi connection my ipad will play whatever is in my itunes imac library without having to actually put it on my ipad and use up space?Hope Im right here.
vintageapple
Mar 23, 01:59 PM
If I can remember correctly it was expensive, something like $250 which is why I passed on it, Maple Ridge auctions had one also, similar price.
One went here in the UK not so long ago for about �75 but not in as nice a condition as yours.
Hey thanks a lot! Glad I saved it now.
One went here in the UK not so long ago for about �75 but not in as nice a condition as yours.
Hey thanks a lot! Glad I saved it now.
Ultrafire88
Apr 17, 06:35 AM
Thank you for the quick response, Night Spring.
You were right - the only choices are to stay at 3.2 or update to 4.3.2.
However, iTunes would not let me restore from my 4.3.1 backup unless I update to 4.3.2. I guess that's logical since the newer 4.3.1 ver would have certain features (like folders) that are not supported by the older 3.2 ver hence the need to update first.
On that basis, I decided to take your advice and update to 4.3.2. Was stumped for a while when I encountered a "3194 error" but later was told by the service centre that it could be caused by Apple's server being shut-down (seems it happens on Sundays in particular). All's resolved now and I am currently doing the restore from my back-up.
Thanks again for the help! Now for the hopefully not-too-long wait for the untethered jb!
You were right - the only choices are to stay at 3.2 or update to 4.3.2.
However, iTunes would not let me restore from my 4.3.1 backup unless I update to 4.3.2. I guess that's logical since the newer 4.3.1 ver would have certain features (like folders) that are not supported by the older 3.2 ver hence the need to update first.
On that basis, I decided to take your advice and update to 4.3.2. Was stumped for a while when I encountered a "3194 error" but later was told by the service centre that it could be caused by Apple's server being shut-down (seems it happens on Sundays in particular). All's resolved now and I am currently doing the restore from my back-up.
Thanks again for the help! Now for the hopefully not-too-long wait for the untethered jb!
crdean1
Oct 24, 03:34 PM
I'll be at Southlake unless the weather is bad/ cold, then I would be at Northpark.
Won't be buying the OS yet but will be getting a free t-shirt. Can't pass that up!
Won't be buying the OS yet but will be getting a free t-shirt. Can't pass that up!
bgish3
Apr 30, 10:57 PM
lets now all place bets on who will win the challenge between p0sixninja and geohot and who will get it first?
My money is on geohot by far no disrespect to p0sixninja but geohot is not human.
My money is on geohot by far no disrespect to p0sixninja but geohot is not human.
mjstew33
Dec 12, 07:53 PM
(By the way, I'm not interested in buying it, just bought a 800mhz G3, just felt like helping you out a bit.)
Darn. Your machine is what I want! :p. Thanks! :)
Darn. Your machine is what I want! :p. Thanks! :)
powermac_daddy
Oct 24, 05:24 PM
lame update for the Macbook Pro.
looking forward for the next update in 2007 - OX 10.5 on macbook pro, then i'm ready to throw out $3,000.
looking forward for the next update in 2007 - OX 10.5 on macbook pro, then i'm ready to throw out $3,000.
drusoicy
Apr 15, 03:07 PM
AirDrop appeared in Finder with the original Dev Preview. When I upgraded to Developer Preview 2, AirDrop was gone. I figured it was some sort of bug, and when I did the Dev Preview 2 Update that was released today, I figured it would return - but I was wrong!
Any idea on how to bring AirDrop back into the Favorites area of the Finder sidebar?? It's not even an option in the Finder Preferences Sidebar section!
Any idea on how to bring AirDrop back into the Favorites area of the Finder sidebar?? It's not even an option in the Finder Preferences Sidebar section!
katie ta achoo
Sep 25, 03:37 PM
The question was could I buy a Mac Mini and Apple display at different times and still use AppleCare for the both of them and the answer was no, I could not. So I'm just going to wait or just get a cheaper LCD.
Well, if you don't want an Apple Display, but still want a pretty nice looking LCD, some people seem to be a bit ga-ga over the Dells. :)
Well, if you don't want an Apple Display, but still want a pretty nice looking LCD, some people seem to be a bit ga-ga over the Dells. :)
andmill
Oct 24, 11:38 PM
Hey, I want to be first in line for leopard at my apple store, so im wondering when you all plan to get in line at your various stores.
tMac85
Jun 27, 10:01 AM
Probably need to mention whether it has a combo drive or superdrive.
Well the 2.0 mini only comes with a super drive. Sorry, thought that was a given.
edit: ^ yes it does.haha
Well the 2.0 mini only comes with a super drive. Sorry, thought that was a given.
edit: ^ yes it does.haha
Wongers
Feb 20, 03:19 PM
Im looking at getting a mac Mini. Which one would be best to get regarding the performance and price increase?
1. 2.4GHz : 320GB - �612.00
img 99 spring makeup tutorial
1. 2.4GHz : 320GB - �612.00
kainjow
Dec 18, 11:03 PM
Very unique. I like it :)
maflynn
Apr 17, 08:12 AM
Does anyone know who this person is? Carolyn Samit is she an Apple employee?
A. who cares.
B. its the internet, most people don't know who anyone is
A. who cares.
B. its the internet, most people don't know who anyone is
joecool85
Mar 22, 01:52 PM
I never understood the point of "folding". So pointless :rolleyes:
I could say the same about your post.
I think its a worthwhile endeavor. I happen to do SETI though, not folding. At least till I get 1000 units done on SETI. Thats my goal.
I could say the same about your post.
I think its a worthwhile endeavor. I happen to do SETI though, not folding. At least till I get 1000 units done on SETI. Thats my goal.
Gr80Likes2Boogi
Apr 27, 06:01 PM
So I would be fine buying a colored, retail version, yes?
And thanks, Sim, for your pm.
And thanks, Sim, for your pm.
a456
Jan 10, 06:40 AM
The point was to thank his family and all the other families for their support in helping get the iPhone ready in the build up to the expo and over the preceding years. Steve thanked the families in his keynote directly. I guess it to the public it says 'we do magic but we have personal lives too', maybe this is the softer side of Steve coming out.
Dave Braine
Apr 28, 11:55 AM
How to fix what?
